Prof. dr. F.J. (Floris) Bex

Buys Ballotgebouw
Princetonplein 5
Kamer 523
3584 CC Utrecht

Prof. dr. F.J. (Floris) Bex

Associate Professor
Responsible AI
+31 30 253 3193
f.j.bex@uu.nl

Publications

2022

Scholarly publications

van de Luijtgaarden, N., Prijs, D., Schraagen, M., & Bex, F. (2022). Abstractive Summarization of Dutch Court Verdicts Using Sequence-to-sequence Models. In Natural Legal Language Processing - NLLP ACL Anthology.
Peters, J. GT., Bex, F. J., & Prakken, H. (2022). Justifications derived from inconsistent case bases using authoritativeness. In ArgXAI ’22 https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3209/2855.pdf
van Lente, J., Borg, A., & Bex, F. (2022). Everyday Argumentative Explanations for Classification. In I. Kuhlmann, J. Mumford, & S. Sarkadi (Eds.), Argumentation & Machine Learning: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Argumentation & Machine Learning co-located with 9th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2022) (Vol. 3208, pp. 14-26). (CEUR Workshop Proceedings; Vol. 3208). CEUR WS. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3208/paper2.pdf
Borg, A., & Bex, F. (2022). Modeling Contrastiveness in Argumentation.. 1-12. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3205/paper1.pdf
Odekerken, D., Borg, A., & Bex, F. (2022). Stability and Relevance in Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks. In F. Toni, S. Polberg, R. Booth, M. Caminada, & H. Kido (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2022 (pp. 272-283). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 353). https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220159
Odekerken, D., Bex, F., Borg, A., & Testerink, B. (2022). Approximating Stability for Applied Argument-based Inquiry. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 16, [200110]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200110
Sartor, G., Araszkiewicz, M., Atkinson, K. D., Bex, F., van Engers, T., Francesconi, E., Prakken, H., Sileno, G., Schilder, F., Wyner, A. Z., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2022). Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30, 521-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09326-7
Craandijk, D., & Bex, F. (2022). Enforcement Heuristics for Argumentation with Deep Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-22) (Vol. 36/5, pp. 5573-5581) https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20497
Borg, A., & Bex, F. (2022). Contrastive Explanations for Argumentation-Based Conclusions. In AAMAS '22: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'22) (pp. 1551-1553). (Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS; Vol. 3). https://www.ifaamas.org/Proceedings/aamas2022/pdfs/p1551.pdf
Wieten, R., Bex, F., Prakken, H., & Renooij, S. (2022). Deductive and abductive argumentation based on information graphs. Argument and Computation, 13(1), 49-91. https://doi.org/10.3233/aac-200539

2021

Scholarly publications

van de Weerd, I., Nieuwenhuis, B., Bex, F., & Beerepoot, I. (2021). Using AI to augment RPA: A conceptual framework. Paper presented at 29th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2021, Marrakech, Morocco. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021_rp/129/
Herrewijnen, E., Nguyen, D., Mense, J., & Bex, F. (2021). Machine-annotated Rationales: Faithfully Explaining Text Classification. Paper presented at 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
van Zee, M., Bex, F., & Ghanavati , S. (2021). RationalGRL: A Framework for Argumentation and Goal Modeling. Argument and Computation, 12(2), 191-245. https://doi.org/10.3233/AAC-200527
Bex, F. J. (2021). Argumentation and Evidence. In C. Dahlman, A. Stein, & G. Tuzet (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law (pp. 183–198). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198859307.003.0014
Robeer, M., Bex, F., & Feelders, A. (2021). Generating Realistic Natural Language Counterfactuals. In M-F. Moens, X. Huang, L. Specia, & S. W. Yih (Eds.), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 (pp. 3611–3625). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://aclanthology.org/2021.findings-emnlp.306/
Borg, A., & Bex, F. (2021). Enforcing Sets of Formulas in Structured Argumentation. In M. Bienvenu, G. Lakemeyer, & E. Erdem (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 130-140). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization. https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2021/13
Bex, F., & Prakken, H. (2021). Can predictive justice improve the predictability and consistency of judicial decision-making? In E. Schweighofer (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2021: The Thirty-Fourth Annual Conference (pp. 207-214). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 346). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA210338
Borg, A., & Bex, F. (2021). Explaining Arguments at the Dutch National Police. In V. Rodríguez-Doncel, M. Palmirani, M. Araszkiewicz, P. Casanovas, U. Pagallo, & G. Sartor (Eds.), AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems XI-XII: AICOL International Workshops 2018 and 2020: AICOL-XI@JURIX 2018, AICOL-XII@JURIX 2020, XAILA@JURIX 2020, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 183-197). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 13048). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89811-3_13
Borg, A., & Bex, F. (2021). Necessary and Sufficient Explanations for Argumentation-Based Conclusions. In J. Vejnarová, & N. Wilson (Eds.), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2021. (pp. 45-58). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 12897 LNAI). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_4
Wieten, R., Bex, F., Prakken, H., & Renooij, S. (2021). Information graphs and their use for Bayesian network graph construction. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 136, 249-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2021.06.007
Bex, F., & Prakken, H. (2021). On the relevance of algorithmic decision predictors for judicial decision making. In J. Maranhão (Ed.), ICAIL '21: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 175-179). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462757.3466069
De Vries, G. M., Bijlsma, J., Mackor, A. M., Bex, F. J., & Meynen, G. (2021). AI-risicotaxatie: nieuwe kansen en risico’s voor statistische voorspellingen van recidive. Strafblad, 2021(2), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.5553/Bsb/266669012021002002004
Borg, A., & Bex, F. (2021). A Basic Framework for Explanations in Argumentation. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 36(2), 25-35. [9329042]. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2021.3053102

2020

Scholarly publications

Peters, J. G. T., & Bex, F. J. (2020). Towards a Story Scheme Ontology of Terrorist MOs. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) (pp. 1-6). [9280515] IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI49825.2020.9280515
Odekerken, D., & Bex, F. J. (2020). Towards Transparent Human-in-the-Loop Classification of Fraudulent Web Shops. In S. Villata, J. Harašta, & P. Křemen (Eds.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (Vol. 334, pp. 239-242). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200873
Prakken, H., Bex, F. J., & Mackor, A. M. (2020). Editors' Review and Introduction: Models of Rational Proof in Criminal Law. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(4), 1053-1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12519
Odekerken, D., Borg, A., & Bex, F. J. (2020). Estimating Stability for Efficient Argument-based Inquiry. In Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2020 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications).
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Bex, F. J., Sartor, G., Prakken, H., & Verheij, B. (2020). In Memoriam Douglas N. Walton: The influence of Doug Walton on AI and Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28(3), 281-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09272-2
Craandijk, D. F. W., & Bex, F. J. (2020). Deep Learning for Abstract Argumentation Semantics. In C. Bessiere (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Yokohama (pp. 1667-1673). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2020/231
Wieten, G. M., Bex, F. J., Prakken, H., & Renooij, S. (2020). Deductive and Abductive Reasoning with Causal and Evidential Information. In H. Prakken, S. Bistarelli, F. Santini, & C. Taticchi (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2020 (pp. 383-394). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 326). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200522
Bex, F. J., & Prakken, H. (2020). De Juridische Voorspelindustrie: onzinnige hype of nuttige ontwikkeling? Ars Aequi, 69, 255-259. https://arsaequi-nl.proxy.library.uu.nl/product/de-juridische-voorspelindustrie-onzinnige-hype-of-nuttige-ontwikkeling/

2019

Scholarly publications

Bex, F. J., & Walton, D. N. (2019). Taking the dialectical stance in reasoning with evidence and proof. The International Journal of Evidence and Proof , 23(1-2), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712718813795
Bijlsma, J., Bex, F. J., & Meynen, G. (2019). Artificiële intelligentie en risicotaxatie. Drie kernvragen voor strafrechtjuristen. Nederlands juristenblad, 2019(44), 3313-3319. [2778]. https://www.navigator.nl/document/id637f09f4ce8e4f2f95ef941ac7a26086?cpid=WKNL-LTR-Nav2&cip=hybrid
Bex, F. J. (2019). The Hybrid Theory of Stories and Arguments applied to the Simonshaven Case. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12426
Odekerken, D., Testerink, B. J. G., & Bex, F. J. (2019). A method for efficient argument-based inquiry. In Flexible Query Answering Systems: 13th International Conference, FQAS 2019, Amantea, Italy, July 2–5, 2019, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence). Springer Verlag. http://www.florisbex.com/papers/FQAS_ArgQA.pdf
Testerink, B. J. G., Odekerken, D., & Bex, F. J. (2019). AI-assisted message processing for the Netherlands National Police. In Proceedings of the ICAIL 2019 Workshop on AI and the Administrative State (AIAS 2019) CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://www.florisbex.com/papers/AIAS2019.pdf
Wieten, R., Bex, F., Prakken, H., & Renooij, S. (2019). Constructing Bayesian Network Graphs from Labeled Arguments. In G. Kern-Isberner, & Z. Ognjanović (Eds.), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty: 15th European Conference, ECSQARU 2019, Belgrade, Serbia, September 18-20, 2019, Proceedings (pp. 99-110). (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence; Vol. 11726). Springer.
De Jong, P., Van Der Werf, J. M. E. M., Van Steenbergen, M., Bex, F., & Brinkhuis, M. (2019). Evaluating Design Rationale in Architecture. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture: proceedings, 25-29 March 2019, Hamburg, Germany (pp. 145-152). [8712158] IEEE Computer Society / Conference Publishing Services. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00033
Wieten, G. M., Bex, F. J., Prakken, H., & Renooij, S. (2019). Supporting Discussions About Forensic Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation. In Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL ’19), June 17–21, 2019, Montreal, QC, Canada (pp. 143-152). ACM Press.
Schraagen, M. P., & Bex, F. J. (2019). Extraction of semantic relations in noisy user-generated law enforcement data. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (pp. 79-86). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2019.00020

Professional publications

Bex, F. (2019). Artificiële intelligentie in de praktijk: lessen uit onderzoek bij de politie. Rechtstreeks, 2019(2), 26-34.
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/391793/Rechtstreeks_v3.1_Bex.pdf?sequence=1

2018

Scholarly publications

Wieten, G. M., Bex, F. J., Prakken, H., & Renooij, S. (2018). Exploiting Causality in Constructing Bayesian Network Graphs from Legal Arguments. In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2018: The Thirty-first Annual Conference (pp. 151-160). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 313). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-151
Schraagen, M. P., Bex, F. J., Odekerken, D., & Testerink, B. J. G. (Accepted/In press). Argumentation-driven information extraction for online crime reports. In International Workshop on Legal Data Analysis and Mining (LeDAM 2018) (CEUR workshop proceedings).
Cerutti, F., Tonolio, A., Norman, T., Bex, F. J., Rahwan, I., & Reed, C. (2018). An OWL2-EL-Compliant AIF Ontology. In S. Modgil, K. Budzynska, & J. Lawrence (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2018 (pp. 455-456). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 305). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-455
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/371757/AIF.pdf?sequence=1
Tang, A., Bex, F. J., Schriek, C., & van der Werf, J. M. E. M. (2018). Improving Software Design Reasoning: A Reminder Card Approach. Journal of Systems and Software, 144, 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.019
Dignum, F. P. M., & Bex, F. J. (2018). Creating Dialogues using Argumentation and Social Practices. In S. Diplaris, A. Satsiou, A. Følstad, M. Vafopoulos, & T. Vilarinho (Eds.), Internet Science: INSCI 2017 International Workshops, IFIN, DATA ECONOMY, DSI, and CONVERSATIONS, Thessaloniki, Greece, November 22, 2017, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 223-235). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 10750). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77547-0_17
Wieten, G. M., Bex, F. J., van der Gaag, L. C., Prakken, H., & Renooij, S. (2018). Refining a heuristic for constructing Bayesian networks from structured arguments. In B. Verheij, & M. Wiering (Eds.), The 29th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2017) (pp. 32-45). (Communications in Computer and Information Science; Vol. 823). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76892-2_3
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/362882/Refining_a_Heuristic_for_Constructing_Bayesian_Networks_from_Structured_Arguments.pdf?sequence=3

2017

Scholarly publications

Jong, P., Steenbergen, M., van der Werf, J. M. E. M., & Bex, F. (2017). Reasoning on Architecture Design. (Technical Report Series; No. UU-CS-2017-019). UU BETA ICS Departement Informatica.
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/358651/2017_019.pdf?sequence=1
Kos, W., Schraagen, M. P., Brinkhuis, M. J. S., & Bex, F. J. (2017). Classification in a Skewed Online Trade Fraud Complaint Corpus. In B. Verheij, & M. Wiering (Eds.), Preproceedings of the 29th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence November 8–9, 2017 in Groningen, The Netherlands: BNAIC 2017 (pp. 172-183)
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/356746/Kos_bnaic_preproceedings.pdf?sequence=1
Schraagen, M. P., Brinkhuis, M. J. S., & Bex, F. J. (2017). Evaluation of Named Entity Recognition in Dutch Online Criminal Complaints. Unpublished. In ICAIL 2017 workshop on Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (DESI VII)
Bex, F. J., Grasso, F., Green, N., Paglieri, F., & Reed, C. (Eds.) (2017). Argument Technologies: Theory, Analysis, and Applications. College Publications.
Zee, M. V., Ghanavati , S., & Bex, F. J. (2017). Argumentation-based Methodology for Goal-oriented Requirements Language (GRL). In Proceedings of the 10th International i* Workshop (iStar 2017) CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/356054/iStar17_paper_15.pdf?sequence=1
Bex, F. J., & Bench-Capon, T. (2017). Arguing with Stories. In P. Olmos (Ed.), Narration as Argument (pp. 31-45). (Argumentation Library). Springer Verlag.
Testerink, B. J. G., & Bex, F. J. (2017). Specifications for peer-to-peer argumentation dialogues. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2017): Lecture Notes in AI (Vol. 10621). Springer Verlag.
Bex, F. J., van Engers, T., Prakken, H., & Verheij, B. (Eds.) (2017). Special Issue for the Workshop Artificial Intelligence for Justice. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(1).
Schraagen, M. P., Brinkhuis, M. J. S., & Bex, F. J. (2017). Evaluation of Named Entity Recognition in Dutch online criminal complaints. Computational Linguistics in The Netherlands journal, 7, 3-16. https://clinjournal.org/clinj/article/view/65
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/356185/01.NERclinjournal.pdf?sequence=1
Bex, F., Prakken, H., van Engers, T., & Verheij, B. (2017). Introduction to the special issue on Artificial Intelligence for Justice (AI4J). Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9198-5
Van Der Werf, J. M. E. M., De Feijter, R., Bex, F., & Brinkkemper, S. (2017). Facilitating collaborative decision making with the software architecture video wall. In Proceedings - 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Workshops, ICSAW 2017: Side Track Proceedings (pp. 137-140). [7958471] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSAW.2017.27

Other output

Testerink, B. J. G., & Bex, F. J. (2017). Developing Argumentation Dialogues for Open Multi-Agent Systems. Paper presented at 20th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2017).
Schraagen, M. P., & Bex, F. J. (2017). Evaluation of named entity recognition in user-submitted police reports. Abstract from CLIN 2017, Leuven, Belgium.

2016

Scholarly publications

Bex, F., Peters, J., & Testerink, B. (2016). AI for online criminal complaints: From natural dialogues to structured scenarios. Artificial Intelligence for Justice Workshop (ECAI 2016), 22-29.
Hovestad, B., & Bex, F. (2016). Making sense of risks: A hybrid argumentative-narrative approach to risk assessment. (Technical Report Series; No. UU-CS-2016-006). UU BETA ICS Departement Informatica.
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/346319/Making.pdf?sequence=1
Bex, F. J. (2016). Het gebruik van verhalen om terroristische aanslagen te voorspellen: Boekbespreking van P.A.M.G. de Kock, Anticipating Criminal Behaviour: Using the narrative in crime-related data. . Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 58(3), 104-107. https://doi.org/10.5553/TvC/0165182X2016058003008
Bex, F. J., Testerink, B. J. G., & Peters, J. (2016). A.I. for Online Criminal Complaints: From Natural Dialogues to Structured Scenarios. In Proceedings of the ECAI 2016 workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Justice
Bex, F. J., & Hovestad, B. (2016). An Argumentative-Narrative Risk Assessment Model. In Proceedings of European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference IEEE Press.
van Zee, M., Marosin, D., Bex, F. J., & Ghanavati , S. (2016). RationalGRL: A Framework for Rationalizing Goal Models Using Argument Diagrams. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling
van Zee, M., Marosin, D., Bex, F. J., & Ghanavati, S. (2016). The RationalGRL Toolset for Goal Models and Argument Diagrams. In Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2016 : Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications IOS Press.
Schriek, C., Tang, A., van der Werf, J. M. E. M., & Bex, F. J. (2016). Software Architecture Design Reasoning: A Card Game to Help Novice Designers. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Software Architecture
Bex, F. J., & Walton, D. (2016). Explanation and Argumentation in Dialogue. Argument and Computation, 7(1).
Bex, F. J., Grasso, F., & Green, N. (2016). Special Issue for the workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument. Argument and Computation.
Bex, F. J., & Renooij, S. (2016). From arguments to constraints on a Bayesian network. In Baroni, Gordon, Scheffler, & Stede (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computional Models of Argument (pp. 95-106). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 287). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-95
Bex, F. J., & Bex-Reimert, V. (2016). Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments: Special issue Methodologies for Research on Legal Argumentation. Informal Logic, 36(3), 349-370. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v36i3.4723
Verheij, B., Bex, F. J., Timmer, S. T., Vlek, C. S., Meyer, J. J. C., Renooij, S., & Prakken, H. (2016). Arguments, scenarios and probabilities: connections between three normative frameworks for evidential reasoning. Law, Probability & Risk, 15(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgv013

Other output

van der Valk, R., Helms, R. W., van de Wetering, R., Bex, F. J., & Corten, R. (2016). Feeling Safe? Privacy Controls and Online Disclosure Behavior. Paper presented at European Conference on Information Systems, Istanbul, Turkey. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1069&context=ecis2016_rip
Verheij, B., Bex, F. J., Timmer, S. T., Vlek, C. S., Meyer, J. J. C., Renooij, S., & Prakken, H. (2016). Arguments, scenarios and probabilities: connections between three normative frameworks for evidential reasoning. 192-193. Abstract from Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam, Netherlands. http://www.cs.uu.nl/groups/IS/archive/henry/lpr2015.pdf

2015

Scholarly publications

Bex-Reimert, V. M., & Bex, F. (2015). Stories and arguments in refugee law.
Bex, F. J. (2015). An integrated theory of causal scenarios and evidential arguments. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 13-22). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2746094
van Zee, M., Bex, F. J., & Ghanavati , S. (2015). Rationalization of Goal Models in GRL using Formal Argumentation. In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2015) (pp. 220 - 225 ). IEEE Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2015.7320426
Bench-Capon, T., & Bex, F. J. (2015). Cases and Stories, Dimensions and Scripts. In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2015: The Twenty Eight Annual Conference. (pp. 11-20). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 279). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-609-5-11

2014

Scholarly publications

Bosma, P., de Haan, H., van der Veen, A., Bex, F., & de Weerd, H. (2014). The role of communication in cooperative hunting in a partially observable world. In Proceedings of the 23rd Belgian-Dutch conference on machine-learning (Benelearn 2014)
Bex, F., & Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Understanding narratives with argumentation. In Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2014 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 266).
Bex, F. (2014). Towards an integrated theory of causal scenarios and evidential arguments. In Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2014 (pp. 133-140). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 266). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-133
Bex, F., Lawrence, J., & Reed, C. (2014). Generalising argument dialogue with the dialogue game execution platform. In Computational Models of Argument: proceedings of COMMA 2014 (pp. 141-152). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 266). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-141
Bex, F., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Arguments as a new perspective on character motive in stories. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29(4), 467-487. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu054
Bex, F., Snaith, M., Lawrence, J., & Reed, C. (2014). ArguBlogging: An Application for the Argument Web. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 25, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2014.02.002

2013

Scholarly publications

Bex, F., & Verheij, B. (2013). Legal stories and the process of proof. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 21(3), 253-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9137-4
Bex, F., Lawrence, J., Snaith, M., & Reed, C. (2013). Implementing the argument web. Communications of the ACM, 56(10), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500891

2012

Scholarly publications

Bex, F., & Verheij, B. (2012). Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes. Argumentation, 26(3), 325-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9257-0
Bex, F., & Walton, D. (2012). Burdens and standards of proof for inference to the best explanation: Three case studies. Law, Probability & Risk, 11(2-3), 113-133. [mgs003]. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgs003
Bex, F., & Reed, C. (2012). Dialogue templates for automatic argument processing. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (1 ed., Vol. 245, pp. 366-377). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 245, No. 1). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-366
Lawrence, J., Bex, F., Reed, C., & Snaith, M. (2012). AIFdb: Infrastructure for the argument web. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (1 ed., Vol. 245, pp. 515-516). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 245, No. 1). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-515
Bex, F., Gordon, T., Lawrence, J., & Reed, C. (2012). Interchanging arguments between Carneades and AIF. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (1 ed., Vol. 245, pp. 390-397). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 245, No. 1). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-390
Lawrence, J., Bex, F., & Reed, C. (2012). Dialogues on the argument web: Mixed initiative argumentation with Arvina. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (1 ed., Vol. 245, pp. 513-514). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 245, No. 1). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-513
Snaith, M., Bex, F., Lawrence, J., & Reed, C. (2012). Implementing ArguBlogging. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (1 ed., Vol. 245, pp. 511-512). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 245, No. 1). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-511
Bex, F. J., Modgil, S. J., Prakken, H., & Reed, C. (2012). On logical reifications of the Argument Interchange Format. Journal of Logic and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exs033

2010

Scholarly publications

Bex, F. J., Prakken, H., & Reed, C. A. (2010). An analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework. In P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, & G. R. Simari (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2010 (pp. 99-110). IOS Press. http://www.cs.uu.nl/groups/IS/archive/henry/comma10-aif.pdf

2008

Scholarly publications

Bex, F. J., & Prakken, H. (2008). Investigating stories in a formal dialogue game. In P. Besnard, S. Doutre, & A. Hunter (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of {COMMA} 2008 (pp. 73-84). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; No. 172). IOS Press. http://www.cs.uu.nl/groups/IS/archive/henry/bexprakken08.pdf

2007

Scholarly publications

Bex, F. J., van den Braak, S. W., van Oostendorp, H., Prakken, H., Verheij, B., & Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (2007). Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments? Law, Probablity and Risk, 6(1-4), 145-168. http://lpr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/mgm007?ijkey=NpByaFIpmKYaR4F&keytype=ref
Bex, F. J., Prakken, H., & Verheij, B. (2007). Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 1-10). ACM Press.

Other output

Bex, F. J., van den Braak, S. W., van Oostendorp, H., Prakken, H., Verheij, B., & Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (2007). Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments?. 311-312. Abstract from Unknown event, Asilomar, USA. http://people.cs.uu.nl/susanb/publications/BNAIC2007_BexBraakEtAl.pdf

2006

Scholarly publications

Bex, F. J., Prakken, H., & Verheij, B. (2006). Anchored narratives in reasoning about evidence. In T. M. van Engers (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference (pp. 11-20). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; No. 152). IOS Press. http://www.cs.uu.nl/research/projects/evidence/publications/Jurix2006BexF.pdf

2005

Scholarly publications

Dijkstra, P., Bex, F. J., Prakken, H., & de Vey Mestdagh, C. N. J. (2005). Outline of a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations. In P. E. D. & T.J.M. Bench-Capon (Ed.), Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 27-37). Wolf Legal Publishers.
Dijkstra, P., Bex, F. J., Prakken, H., & de Vey Mestdagh, C. N. J. (2005). Towards a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 13.

2004

Scholarly publications

Bex, F. J., & Prakken, H. (2004). Reinterpreting arguments in dialogue: an application to evidential reasoning. In T. F. Gordon (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference (pp. 119-129). IOS Press.
Bex, F. J., Prakken, H., Reed, C., & Walton, D. N. (2004). Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 12, 125-165.