Dr. Bregje Holleman

Universitair hoofddocent
Taal en communicatie
Language and communication
030 253 6029
b.holleman@uu.nl

Zie ook mijn cv/publicatielijst (in pdf onder tabblad cv) of mijn google.scholar-profiel

 

 

 

Sleutelpublicaties

van Berkum, J. J. A., Holleman, B. C., Nieuwland, M., Otten, M., & Murre, J. J. M. (2009). Right or wrong? The brain's fast response to morally objectionable statements. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1092-1099. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02411.x
Holleman, B. C., & Pander Maat, H. L. W. (2009). The pragmatics of profiling: Framing effects in text interpretation and text production. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2004-2221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.038
Kamoen, N., van de Pol, J., Krouwel, A., de Vreese, C., & Holleman, B. C. (2019). Issue framing in online voting advice applications: The effect of left-wing and right-wing headers on reported attitudes. PLoS One, 14(2), [e0212555]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212555
Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2014). Beyond young, highly educated males: a typology of VAA users. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 11(4), 397-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.958794
Holleman, B. C., & Murre, J. J. M. (2008). Getting from neuron to checkmark: models and methods in cognitive survey research. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 709-732. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1398
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., Mak, P., Sanders, T., & van den Bergh, H. (2017). Why are negative questions difficult to answer? On the processing of linguistic contrasts in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(3), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx010
Kamoen, N., van de Pol, J., Krouwel, A., de Vreese, C., & Holleman, B. C. (2018). “I don’t know”: The effects of question polarity on ‘no opinion’ answers. Survey Practice, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2018-0017
van de Pol, J., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., de Vreese, C., & Holleman, B. C. (2019). Same but different: A typology of Voting Advice Application users in first‑ and second‑order elections. Acta Politica, 54(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0083-3
Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., van de Pol, J., & de Vreese, C. (2016). Positive vs. Negative: The Impact of Question Polarity in Voting Advice Applications. PLoS One, 11(10), [e0164184]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164184
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B. C., & van den Bergh, H. (2013). Positive, negative, and bipolar questions: the effect of question polarity on ratings of text readability. Survey Research Methods, 7(3), 183-189. http://www.websm.org/db/12/17062/Web%20Survey%20Bibliography/Positive_negative_and_bipolar_questions_The_effect_of_question_polarity_on_ratings_of_text_readability/
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/287515/5034_artcl.pdf?sequence=1
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B. C., Mak, W. M., Sanders, T. J. M., & van den Bergh, H. H. (2011). Agree or Disagree? Cognitive processes involved in answering contrastive survey questions. Discourse Processes, 48(5), 355-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.578910
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/258831/DP.pdf?sequence=1

Publicaties

2021

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Blom, W. M., van Dijk, L., Michelsen-Huisman, A. D., Houben, G., Knulst, A., Verhoeckx, K., Linders, Y., Holleman, B., & Lentz, L. (2021). Allergen labelling: Current practice and improvement from a communication perspective. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 51(4), 574. [13830]. https://doi.org/https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1111/cea.13830
Strikwerda, J., Holleman, B., & Hoeken, H. (2021). Supporting pension participants: Three lessons learned from the medical domain for better pension decisions. Netspar Design Paper, 167. https://www.netspar.nl/assets/uploads/P20210223_Netspar_Design-paper_167.pdf
Blom, W. M., van Dijk, L. M., Michelsen-Huisman, A., Houben, G. F., Knulst, A., Verhoeckx, K., Linders, Y. F. M., Holleman, B. C., & Lentz, L. R. (2021). Allergen labelling: Current practice and improvement from a communication perspective. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.13830

2020

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C., Oldenhuis, P., & Kamoen, N. (2020). Issueframing als een vorm van equivalence framing: het effect van progressieve versus conservatieve introductieteksten op gerapporteerde attitudes in politieke stemhulpen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 42(3), 279-308. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2020.3.003.HOLL
Holleman, B. C. (2020). Het gebruik van digitale stemhulpen: wijzer stemmen of alleen met meer zelfvertrouwen? In J. de Ridder, R. Vliegenthart, & J. Zuure (Eds.), Doen, durven of de waarheid?: Democratie in digitale tijden. (pp. 183-200). Amsterdam University Press.

2019

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Kamoen, N., van de Pol, J., Krouwel, A., de Vreese, C., & Holleman, B. C. (2019). Issue framing in online voting advice applications: The effect of left-wing and right-wing headers on reported attitudes. PLoS One, 14(2), [e0212555]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212555
van de Pol, J., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., de Vreese, C., & Holleman, B. C. (2019). Same but different: A typology of Voting Advice Application users in first‑ and second‑order elections. Acta Politica, 54(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0083-3

Populariserende publicaties

Holleman, B. C. (2019). Kan (mogelijk) sporen bevatten. Illuster, Oktober 2019, 25. file:///C:/Users/stass101/AppData/Local/Google/Chrome/Downloads/uuuf141_illuster_85_future_food_lr_spreads_v2.pdf

2018

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C., Felker, E., Kamoen, N., & Struiksma, M. E. (2018). Negativity and emotions: valence framing effects in in L1 and L2. Paper presented at 68th ICA Conference, Prague, Czech Republic.
Krouwel, A., Holleman, B. C., Kamoen, N., van de Pol, J., & de Vreese, C. (2018). Effecten van online stemhulpen. In K. Peters (Ed.), Jaarboek 2018, Vereniging van Griffiers (Vol. 2018, pp. 19-28). Kirra Reporting. http://jaarboek2018.griffiers.nl/
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/375603/kwouwel.pdf?sequence=1
Kamoen, N., & Holleman, B. C. (2018). I get it! Using qualitative and quantitative data to investigae comprehension difficulties in political attitude surveys. Unpublished. In BigSurv
van de Pol, J., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., de Vreese, C., & Holleman, B. C. (Accepted/In press). Same but different: How types of users use Voting Advice Applications in first- and second-order elections. Acta Politica, 1-20.
Kamoen, N., van de Pol, J., Krouwel, A., de Vreese, C., & Holleman, B. C. (2018). “I don’t know”: The effects of question polarity on ‘no opinion’ answers. Survey Practice, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2018-0017

Overige resultaten

Holleman, B. C., Felker, E., Kamoen, N., & Struiksma, M. E. (2018, Jan 17). Positiviteit vs. negativiteit: begripseffect of emotionele reactie?
Kamoen, N., & Holleman, B. C. (2018). Ik snap het niet. Begripsproblemen bij het beantwoorden van opinievragen in stemhulpen.. Paper presented at VIOT, Groningen, Netherlands.

2017

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C., & Kamoen, N. (2017). Attitude strength as an explanation for wording effects in political attitude questions. In 7th International Conference of the European Survey Research Association
Kamoen, N., & Holleman, B. C. (2017). I don't get it: Response difficulties in answering political attitude statements in Voting Advice Applications. In 7th International European Survey Research Association Conference (pp. 125-140). (Survey research methods; Vol. 11, No. 2)..
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/359513/6728_22644_1_PB.pdf?sequence=1
Holleman, B. C., & Kamoen, N. (2017). Stemadvies via het Internet: Politiek begrip in een digitale informatiemaatschappij. Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing, 39(2), 209-229. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2017.2.HOLB
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/355992/Stemadvies.pdf?sequence=1
Holleman, B. C., Jansen, C. J. M., & Sanders, T. J. M. (2017). Begrijpelijke Taal en Effectieve Communicatie II. Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing, 39(2), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2017.2.HOLL
Holleman, B. C., & Kamoen, N. (2017). Cognition in Surveys 2017: Conference session at the 7th Conference of the European Survey Research Association. In Cognition in surveys
Kamoen, N., & Holleman, B. C. (2017). "I don't get it." Response difficulties in answering political attitude questions in Voting Advice Applications. Survey Research Methods, 11(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2017.v11i2.6728
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., Mak, P., Sanders, T., & van den Bergh, H. (2017). Why are negative questions difficult to answer? On the processing of linguistic contrasts in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(3), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx010

Overige resultaten

Kamoen, N., & Holleman, B. C. (2017, Jan 26). I don't get it. Response difficulties in answering of political attitude statements in VAAs.
Holleman, B. C. (2017). The contribution of VAAs to participation in democracy. Paper presented at How language and social cognition shape cooperation. , Utrecht, .
Holleman, B. C., Dietz, F., & Leufkens, S. C. (2017, May 10). Hiphop in de Neerlandistiek. De Utrechtse Neerlandistiek nu en in 2040. https://vimeo.com/214517180

2016

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C., & de Vreese, C. (2016). Voting Advice Applications as political decision aids. Effects on political literacy and political attitudes: Eindrapportage van 4jarig NWOproject in Begrijpelijke Taalprogramma (321-89-003). NWO.
Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., van de Pol, J., & de Vreese, C. (2016). Positive vs. Negative: The Impact of Question Polarity in Voting Advice Applications. PLoS One, 11(10), [e0164184]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164184
van Outersterp, R., Kamoen, N., & Holleman, B. C. (2016). Inwisselbaar of niet? De middelste antwoordoptie en de non-responsoptie in stemhulpen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 38(1), 27-55. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2016.1.OUTE
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/344081/Inwisselbaar.pdf?sequence=1

Overige resultaten

van de Pol, J., Holleman, B. C., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, & Vreese (2016). Issueframing in stemhulpen: een veldexperiment. Paper presented at VIOT, Leuven, Belgium.
Holleman, B. C., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., van de Pol, J., & de Vreese, C. (2016). Positive vs. negative: how question polarity in Voting Advice Applications affects the answers and the voting advice. Paper presented at american association of public, Austin, United States.
van de Pol, J., & Holleman, B. C. (2016, Dec 16). The effect of Voting Advice Applications on Political Understanding.
Kamoen, N., & Holleman, B. (2016). Who gets it? Comprehension difficulties in political attitude questions. american association of public, Austin, United States.
Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2016). The effect of Voting Advice Applications on political efficacy and knowledge: A quasi-experiment. Etmaal van de Communicatiewetenschap, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2016). Do Voting  Advice Applications Narrow the Digital Divide? A Quasi Experiment. Waapor, .
Holleman, B., & Kamoen, N. (2016). Combining pretest methods to investigate comprehension problems in attitude questions: Evidence from Voting Advice Applications. QDET2 conference, Miami, United States.

2015

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C., Kamoen, N., van de Pol, J., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2015). Positive vs. negative. How question polarity in VAAs affects the answers and the voting advice. In ICA Conference
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B. C., van de Pol, J., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2015). The Effect of Voting Advice Applications on Political Knowledge and Vote Choice. Irish Political Studies, 30(4), 595-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2015.1099096

Overige resultaten

Holleman, B. C., & Kamoen, N. (2015, Jul 19). Cognitive processes underlying the answers to Voting Advice Applications. Think aloud studies.
Holleman, B. C., & Kamoen, N. (2015). Positive vs. Negative. Question Polarity in Voting Advice Applications: affecting the answers and the advice. Paper presented at ICA , Puerto Rico, United States.
Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B. C., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2015). Issue framing effects in VAAs: a randomized field experiment. Abstract from Etmaal van de Communicatiewetnschappen, United Kingdom.
Holleman, B. C., & Kamoen, N. (2015). Positive vs Negative. Question polarity in Voting Advice Applications: Effecting the answers and the advice.
Kamoen, N., Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B. C., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2015). Valence framing in Voting Advice Applications (VAAs): Effects on substantive and non-substantive answers. Abstract from ESRA , Reykjavik, Iceland.
Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B. C., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2015). Issue framing effects in VAAs: A field experiment. Abstract from ESRA , Reykjavik, Iceland.
Holleman, B. C., & Kamoen, N. (2015). Cognitive processes underlying the answers to Voting Advice Applications: Think aloud studies. Abstract from ESRA , Reykjavik, Iceland.
van de Pol, J., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., De Vreese, C., & Holleman, B. C. (2015). Issue framing in online voting advice applications. Paper presented at ICA , Puerto Rico, United States.

2014

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2014). Beyond young, highly educated males: a typology of VAA users. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 11(4), 397-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.958794

Overige resultaten

Holleman, B., & Kamoen, N. (2014). Valence framing in stemhulpen: Een veldexperiment. Abstract from VIOT, Leuven, Belgium.
Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2014). Issue and valence framing effects in VAAs. Abstract from WAPOR, Nice, France.
Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2014). Users of Voting Advice Applications: A Typology. Abstract from Etmaal van de Communicatiewetenschappen, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Holleman, B., & Kamoen, N. (2014). Voting Advice Applications: Towards a better understanding of politics. Abstract from Springfest, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2014). A typology of VAA users. Abstract from ICA, Seattle, United States.
Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2014). Issue framing in VAAs: A Field Experiment. Abstract from Politicologenetmaal, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2014). Issue and valence framing effects in VAAs.. Abstract from ECPR graduate conference, Innsbruck, Austria.
Kamoen, N., & Holleman, B. (2014). The effect of VAAs on political knowledge and vote choice.
Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., Van de Pol, J., & De Vreese, C. (2014). Positive versus Negative wordings: a threat to the validity of VAAs.

2013

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C., Kamoen, N., & de Vreese, C. (2013). Stemadvies via Internet: antwoorden, attitudes, stemintenties. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 35(1), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2013.1.HOLL
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/379379/TvT.pdf?sequence=1
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B. C., & van den Bergh, H. (2013). Positive, negative, and bipolar questions: the effect of question polarity on ratings of text readability. Survey Research Methods, 7(3), 183-189. http://www.websm.org/db/12/17062/Web%20Survey%20Bibliography/Positive_negative_and_bipolar_questions_The_effect_of_question_polarity_on_ratings_of_text_readability/
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/287515/5034_artcl.pdf?sequence=1

Vakpublicaties

Holleman, B. C., Kamoen, N., & de Vreese, C. (2013). Effectief communiceren (4). Stemadvieshulpen onder de loep. Tekst(blad), 2013(2), 26-27.

Overige resultaten

Kamoen, N., & Holleman, B. C. (2013). Voting Engagement Tools as political decision aids. Effects on political literacy and political attitudes.
Holleman, B. C., Kamoen, N., & van de Pol, J. (2013, Nov 29). Stemadvies via Internet.
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., & Van den Bergh, H. (2013). Why are negative questions hard to answer? On the processing of contrastive questions in attitude surveys.. Abstract from ESRA, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2013). Beyond young, higher educated males. A typology of VAA users. Abstract from Politicologenetmaal, Gent, Belgium.
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., & Van den Bergh, H. (2013). Agree or Disagree? Cognitive processes in answering contrastive survey questions. Abstract from SARMAC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Van de Pol, J., Holleman, B., Kamoen, N., Krouwel, A., & De Vreese, C. (2013). Beyond young higher educated males: a typology of VAA users.

2012

Overige resultaten

Kamoen, N. (Author), & Holleman, B. C. (Author). (2012). Voting Advice via Internet. Web publication/site http://vavi.wp.hum.uu.nl/

2011

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Kamoen, N., Holleman, B. C., Nouwen, R. W. F., Sanders, T. J. M., & van den Bergh, H. H. (2011). Absolutely relative or relatively absolute? The linguistic behavior of gradable adjectives and degree modifiers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(15), 3639-3892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.017
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/258826/JOP.pdf?sequence=1
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B. C., Mak, W. M., Sanders, T. J. M., & van den Bergh, H. H. (2011). Agree or Disagree? Cognitive processes involved in answering contrastive survey questions. Discourse Processes, 48(5), 355-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.578910
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/258831/DP.pdf?sequence=1

Overige resultaten

Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., & Van den Bergh, H. (2011). How easy is a text that is not difficult? Comparing answers to positive, negative, and bipolar questions. Abstract from ECPR, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., & Van den Bergh, H. (2011). Agree or Disagree? Cognitive processes in answering contrastive survey questions. Abstract from ECPR, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., & Van den Bergh, H. (2011). Absolutely relative or relatively absolute? The linguistic behavior of gradable adjectives and degree modifiers. Abstract from Experimental Pragmatics, Barcelona, Spain.
Holleman, B. C. (Author), & Sanders, T. J. M. (Author). (2011). http://communicatieofmediastuderen.nl/. Web publication/site

2010

Overige resultaten

Holleman, B. C. (2010). Why ‘bad’ is stronger than ‘good’. The use of lexical contrasts in language, communication and cognition. onbekend.

2009

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

van Berkum, J. J. A., Holleman, B. C., Nieuwland, M., Otten, M., & Murre, J. J. M. (2009). Right or wrong? The brain's fast response to morally objectionable statements. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1092-1099. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02411.x
Holleman, B. C., & Pander Maat, H. L. W. (2009). The pragmatics of profiling: Framing effects in text interpretation and text production. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2004-2221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.038

Overige resultaten

Holleman, B., & Kamoen, N. (2009). Keynote: cognition in surveys.
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., & Van den Bergh, H. (2009). Eye-catching! Cognitive processes in answering contrastive survey questions: the use of eye-tracking. Poster session presented at ST&D, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., & Van den Bergh, H. (2009). Cognitive processes in answering contrastive survey questions: the use of eye-tracking. Abstract from ESRA, Warschau, Poland.
Holleman, B. C. (Author), van Berkum, J. J. A. (Author), & Murre, J. J. M. (Author). (2009). Personal values colour sentence comprehension within milliseconds. Digital or Visual Products

2008

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C. (2008). Text Comprehension. Information Design Journal, 16(2), 153-154. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.16.2.07res
Holleman, B. C., & Murre, J. J. M. (2008). Getting from neuron to checkmark: models and methods in cognitive survey research. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 709-732. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1398
Holleman, B. C. (2008). Survey design: mode effects. Information Design Journal, 16(2), 152-153. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.16.1.09res
Holleman, B. C. (2008). Pictures & Text. Information Design Journal, 16(3), 263-264. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.16.3.11res

Populariserende publicaties

Holleman, B. C. (2008). Sturende vragen [Leading questions]. In J. Reid, B. Geleijnse, & J-M. van Tol (Eds.), Fokke & Sukke kunnen het niet alleen (pp. 22-24). Catullus.

Overige resultaten

Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., & Van den Bergh, H. (2008). Ondeskundige Balkenende. Abstract from Bessensap, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., & Van den Bergh, H. (2008). Een meta-analyse naar het effect van vraagformulering in tekstevaluatieonderzoek. Abstract from Anela Juniorendag, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., & Van den Bergh, H. (2008). Easy isn't difficult. Using meta-analysis to compare positive likert-scales, negative likert-scales and semantic differential scales. Abstract from AAPOR, New Orleans, United States.
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., & Van den Bergh, H. (2008). Absoluut relatief of relatief absoluut? Een empirische toetsing van een semantische classificatie van woordparen om formuleringseffecten te verklaren. Abstract from VIOT, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

2007

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Chessa, A. G., & Holleman, B. C. (2007). Answering attitudinal questions: Modeling the response process underlying contrastive questions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(2), 203-225. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1337
Holleman, B. C. (2007). Designing Surveys. Information Design Journal, 15(3), 288-288. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.3.10res
Holleman, B. C. (2007). Cognitive load. Information Design Journal, 15(1), 88-89. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.1.11len
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/379467/Cognitive.pdf?sequence=1
Kamoen, N., Holleman, B. C., & van den Bergh, H. (2007). Hoe gemakkelijk is een niet moeilijke tekst? Een meta-analyse naar het effect van vraagformulering bij het meten van tekstwaardering. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 29(4), 314-330.
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/258824/TvT.pdf?sequence=1
Holleman, B. C. (2007). Misinformation and false memories. Information Design Journal, 15(1), 85-86. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.1.11len
Holleman, B. C. (2007). Designing good surveys. Information Design Journal, 15(1), 86-86. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.1.11len
Holleman, B. C. (2007). Cognition & Survey Design. Information Design Journal, 15(3), 288-288. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.3.01san
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/379464/Survey.pdf?sequence=1
Holleman, B. C. (2007). Instruction & Cognitive Load. Information Design Journal, 15(1), 88.
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/379463/Instruction.pdf?sequence=1

2006

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C. (2006). The language of lies. Information Design Journal, 14(2), 181-181. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.2.09res
Holleman, B. C. (2006). Expertise Research. Information Design Journal, 14(2), 179-180. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.2.09res
Holleman, B. C. (2006). Issue framing. Information Design Journal, 14(2), 177-178. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.2.09res
Holleman, B. C. (2006). 'The meanings of 'yes' and 'no. An explanation for the forbid/allow asymmetry. Quality and Quantity, 40(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-4479-6
Holleman, B. C. (2006). Public opinion polls. Information Design Journal, 14(2), 178-178. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.2.09res
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/379469/Public.pdf?sequence=1

Overige resultaten

Holleman, B. C. (2006, Oct 6). Opponent verdeging proefschrift van Sanne van 't Hof. Universiteit Utrecht.

2005

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C. (2005). Question wording effects and processes of question answering. A different way of measuring response latencies. In C. van Dijkum, J. Blasius, & C. Durand (Eds.), Recent developments and applications in social research methodology. Proceedings of the RC33 6th International Conference On Social Science Methodology. Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Holleman, B. C. (2005). Information Processing. Information design journal + Document design, 13(2), 172-172. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.2.10res
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/379474/Information.pdf?sequence=1
Holleman, B. C. (2005). Research Watch: Information Processing. Information Design Journal, 13(2), 172-173. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.2.10res
Holleman, B. C. (2005). Bespreking: Waveren, Michelle van (2004). Interviewen. Onthullend en respectvol. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 27, 81-82.

Populariserende publicaties

Holleman, B. C. (2005). Zelfs koopzondag leent zich niet voor een referendum. Dagblad Trouw, 7.

2004

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Tuijn, S., van den Bergh, H., & Holleman, B. C. (2004). Het sturend effect van vragen met voorbeeldantwoorden in een face-to-face setting. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 26(1), 1-20.
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/379479/taalbeh_2004_nr1.pdf?sequence=1
Holleman, B. C. (2004). Question wording effects and processes of question answering. A different way to measure response latencies. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Social Science Methodology Universiteit van Amsterdam.

Vakpublicaties

Holleman, B. C., & van de Zande, L. (2004). 'Ik ben altijd een onderwijspersoon gebleven': Interview met Thijs Pollmann bij zijn afscheid. Nednummer, 9(2), 2-7.

Populariserende publicaties

Holleman, B. C. (2004). Slopen of afbreken? Het formuleren van enquêtevragen. Onze Taal, (6), 173-175.

2002

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

van den Berg, H., Mehciz, M., Houtkoop-Steenstra, J. P., & Holleman, B. C. (2002). Opinie-maken of opinie-meten. De rol van stellingvragen in markt- en opinieonderzoek. Stichting voor Culturele Studies.

2001

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C., & van de Zande, L. (2001). Het moet ronken. Interview met Aspasia-onderzoekers Hanneke Houtkoop en Marijke Meijer Drees. Nednummer, 6(1), 3-10.
Holleman, B. C., & Schilperoord, J. (2001). Taalkunde en taalbeheersing: What's in a name. Nederlandse taalkunde, 6(3), 233-238.
Holleman, B. C. (2001). Bookreview Schrijven voor (multi)media. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 23, 65-67.

Vakpublicaties

Vaessens, T. L., Holleman, B. C., Koppenol, J., Huening, M., & van Oostendorp, M. (2001). Waarom een nieuw tijdschrift? Bij de lancering van Neelandistiek.nl. neerlandistiek.nl, 1(1).
Holleman, B. C. (2001). Bookreview 'neerlandistiek.nl'. Eerste elektronisch wetenschappelijk tijdschrift voor de neerlandistiek. Nednummer, 6, 16-17.

2000

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C. (2000). The forbid/allow asymmetry. On the cognitive mechanisms underlying wording effects in surveys. Rodopi.
Holleman, B. C. (2000). The forbid/allow asymmetry. On the cognitive mechanisms underlying wording effects in surveys. Rodopi.

Vakpublicaties

Holleman, B. C. (2000). Document Design. Journal of research and problem solving in organizational communication. Nednummer, 5(2), 14-15.

1998

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C. (1998). De oorbellen van de minister. Taal en denken over vrouwen. Taalbeheersing, 3, 279-281.
Holleman, B. C. (Accepted/In press). Procedures van vragenlijstconstructie (project in het kader van een detachering bij de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

Populariserende publicaties

Holleman, B. C., & van de Zande, L. (1998). 'Mijn liefhebberij was zomaar ineens mijn vak'. Interview met Wim Drop. Nednr. Tijdschrift van Nedwerk, Alumnivereniging Utrechtse Neerlandici, (1), 4-7.
Holleman, B. C. (1998). Hoe verwijs je naar een website? Op zoek naar taaladvies. Nednr. Tijdschrift van Nedwerk, Alumnivereniging Utrechtse Neerlandici, 2, 18-20.

1997

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C. (Accepted/In press). -. Taalbeheersing, 19, 1-1.
Holleman, B. C. (Accepted/In press). Themanummer Tekstevaluatie. Taalbeheersing, 18, 70-71.

1996

Wetenschappelijke publicaties

Holleman, B. C. (Accepted/In press). Is verbieden niet toelaten? Een meta-analyse. In H. van den Bergh, D. Janssen, N. Bertens, & M. Damen (Eds.), Taalgebruik ontrafeld. Bijdragen van het zevende VIOT-taalbeheersingscongres gehouden op 18, 19 en 20 december 1996 aan de Universiteit van Utrecht (pp. 427-438). Foris Publications.

 

Zie verder mijn cv/publicatielijst (in pdf onder tabblad cv) of mijn google.scholar-profiel