The ‘Corporate Rule of Law Responsibility’ (CRLR) project is part of the ‘resilient societies’ research theme of the Faculty of Law Economics and Governance, funded by the 2016 Research Impulse Fund. Within this research theme, studies focus on the shifting roles of, and relations between, various actors in a changing and challenging society. This shift requires resilient rule of law mechanisms, to prevent and redress violations of fundamental rights such as human rights. The CRLR project looks at corporations which, through globalization and privatization, have taken in dominant positions in present-day society. Through these positions, corporations run the risk of having adverse impacts on human rights.
Awareness about the possibilities of corporations to become involved in human rights violations has resulted in various governance mechanisms proposed to address these risks. These include, for example, 'naming and shaming' activities by civil society organizations, voluntary codes, corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts, reporting obligations as well as calls to extend the jurisdiction of the international criminal court to include legal persons. Yet little empirical data is available on whether such efforts would actually change corporate behavior and/or prevent corporate contributions to the violation of human rights. Our aim is to close this kgap in knowledge by investigating the effectiveness of governance mechanisms on corporate multinational activity.
With an initial duration of 2,5 years, the CRLR project will conduct research on the empirical effects of legal and non-legal regulation of large multinational businesses. Taking an empirical approach, the project draws on legal, economic and governance theories and is explicitly interdisciplinary. The first stage of the project consists of a study into reputational damage as a regulatory mechanism for corporate (involvement in) human rights violations. In terms of impact, the aim is to develop high-quality research and add to (inter)national policy debates on how existing legal and non-legal mechanisms can be made (more) effective, making adequate use of existing forces & incentives within corporations.
Van Erp, Judith (2016) 'Toezicht in de open samenleving' Oratie/Inaugural Address, Utrecht University
Van Erp, Judith (2011). Naming without shaming: The publication of sanctions in the Dutch financial market - Naming without shaming. Regulation and Governance, 5 (3), (pp. 287-308).
Engelen, P.J. (2012). What Is the Reputational Cost of a Dishonest CEO? Evidence from US Illegal Insider Trading. CESifo Economic Studies, 58, (pp. 140-163) (24 p.).
Engelen, P.J. & van Essen, M. (2011). The Role of Financial Markets to Induce Corporate Responsibility. In W. Vandekerckhove, J. Leys, B. Scholtens, S. Signori & H. Schäfer (Eds.), Responsible Investment in Times of Turmoil (Issues in Business Ethics Series) (pp. 55-74) (20 p.). Springer Publishers.
Enneking, L.F.H., Kristen, F.G.H., Pijl, K.C.I., Waterbolk, T.A., Emaus, J.M., Hiel, M.F.J., Giesen, I. & Schaap, A.L.M. (07-07-2016). Zorgplichten van Nederlandse ondernemingen inzake internationaal maatschappelijk verantwoord ondernemen - Een rechtsvergelijkend en empirisch onderzoek naar de stand van zaken van het Nederlandse recht in het licht van de UN Guiding Principles. (708 p.). Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
Enneking, Liesbeth (2014). The future of foreign direct liability? Exploring the international relevance of the Dutch Shell Nigeria case. Utrecht Law Review, 10 (1), (pp. 44-54) (10 p.).
van Baar, Annika & Huisman, Wim (2012). The oven builders of the Holocaust. A case study of corporate complicity in international crimes. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1033-1050.
van Baar, Annika (2015). Corporate involvement in the Holocaust and other Nazi crimes. In J. van Erp, G. Vanderwalle & W. Huisman (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of White-Collar and Corporate Crime in Europe (133-150). New York: Routledge.