On the second day of the Urban Futures festival (Thursday March 17th), an excursion to Overvecht offered an opportunity to experience first-hand the 'evolutionary potential of the present’: concrete projects which exemplify the future potential of this neighbourhood.
A select transdisciplinary group of practitioners, scientists, policy makers and other stakeholders visited Overvecht to witness new stories about the future of this neighborhood as they are unfolding in the present, with the idea that in present innovation you can can see glimpses of the future.
The idea of the excursion was to provide an applied mission statement of the Urban Futures Studio: to take the abstract ideas discussed during the conference the day before, and make them concrete and tangible by showing what they mean in real practice. Overvecht offered an ideal place to do this. It is a typical modernist neighborhood developed in the mid-1900’s that now faces many challenges: health, unemployment, safety, social cohesion, unsustainability. At the same time, there are many projects and initiatives in Overvecht that deal with these challenges and by that help to create a new future for Overvecht. By visiting some of these projects, the group was able to see, touch, hear and feel the opportunities and tensions of working towards a new future.
In three groups, the participants visited three projects in which they could experience different visions of the future for Overvecht, and their methods to get there:
RESEARCH BY DESIGN: Atelier Utrecht & HIK Ontwerpers
Two designers presented their different visions for the future of a particular place in Overvecht: the shopping centre. Their perspectives, approaches and visions differed greatly: one, a local designer, started from the bottom-up with the neighborhood and the people in it; the other, a designer from Belgium, was commissioned to do a research project on the development of the shopping centre. In the discussion between them and the participants, frictions came up about the challenges of developing this kind of space, which echoed the questions posed during the conference: Who’s future is being created? Who is involved? Who decides?