Projects

Modalities in Substructural Logics: Theory, Methods and Applications (MOSAIC)

Logic is a discipline that studies correct reasoning and true statements in a formal environment. Languages, deductive systems, syntax and semantics are its basic tools. Classical modal logics form a family of logics that focus on modes of truth, that is to say, they analyse if a statement is 'necessarily' or 'possibly' true, in a given situation. The EU-funded MOSAIC project is taking a closer look at modal logics based on the general setting of substructural logics and also aims at developing tools and methods for substructural modal logics to impact several areas of applied science such as artificial intelligence, security and legal reasoning.

  • UU Project member: Dr Rosalie Iemhoff
  • Duration: 2020 - 2025
  • Funding: EU/RISE-MSCA
Optimal Proofs

Logics occur in great diversity in mathematics, philosophy, computer science, and linguistics. Proof systems are syntactical descriptions of them, often with good computational properties. The aim of the project is to desrcibe the possible proof systems that a logic can have, and to determine the optimal ones among them, where optimality is determined by the way in which the logic is used.

  • Project Coordinator: Dr Rosalie Iemhoff
  • Duration: 2018 - 2023
  • Funding: NWO/VICI
Shaping our action space: a situated perspective on self-control

Self-control is more important than ever: living in contemporary society requires us to resist temptations continuously, and to allocate our time and money wisely. But, what does it mean to exercise self-control? Traditionally, self-control was understood in terms of individual willpower. However, the concept of willpower now faces criticism on both conceptual and psychological grounds. On the opposite side of the spectrum, we find those who argue that self-control is about engineering the environment to nudge us towards prudent behavior. But can nudging be seen as genuine self-control? This research project aims to develop a third-way approach to understanding self-control. 

  • Project Coordinator: Dr Annemarie Kalis
  • Project members: Josephine Pascoe, Rosa Rooduijn, Cato Benschop and Miguel Segundo Ortin
  • Duration: 2019 - 2024
  • Funding: NWO/VIDI
Unifying Metaphysical Pluralism

Science is our collective effort at understanding the world we live in. Yet, remarkably, different sciences can seem to be worlds apart, each studying its own set of things and phenomena. But the world they thus study is single, not many. How can that be? It seems that we face a metaphysical choice. Either the diversity of sciences can be somehow brought back to one, physics being the likely candidate, with its promise of a ‘theory of everything’. Or we embrace the plurality and subscribe to a ‘disunity of things’. This project aims to reconcile the idea of unity that speaks for the former option with the idea of diversity that motivates the latter option, by understanding the diversity as the internal articulation of the unitary conception of reality.

  • Project Coordinator: Dr Jesse Mulder
  • Duration: 2017 - 2021
  • Funding: NWO/VENI
Comparative Analysis of Conspiracy Theories (COMPACT)

Conspiracy theories play an increasingly visible role in contemporary European culture and the public domain of politics. Notwithstanding moral debates about their effects on knowledge, democracy and mental health, there has been little systematic research on where they come from, how they work and what, if anything, should be done about them. The aim of this Action is to develop an interdisciplinary and international network to provide a comprehensive understanding of conspiracy theories in different European countries.

  • Project Coordinator: Prof Peter Knight (University of Manchester)
  • Project members at UU: Prof. Daniel Cohnitz
  • Duration: 2016 - 2020
  • Funding: COST
Logical and Methodological Analysis of Scientific Reasoning Processes (LMASRP)

The aim of LMASRP is to coordinate and stimulate research on two themes: 1) Logical analysis of scientific reasoning processes. 2) Methodological and epistemological analysis of scientific reasoning processes. Examples of specific topics that fit into the first theme are: logical analyses of paraconsistent reasoning, reasoning under uncertainty, defeasible reasoning, abduction, causal reasoning, induction, analogical reasoning, belief revision, reasoning about action and norms, erotetic reasoning (i.e. reasoning about questions), argumentation.

  • Project Coordinator: Prof. Eric Weber (Ghent University)
  • Project members at UU: Prof. Jan Broersen, Dr Allard Tamminga
  • Duration: 2016 - 2020
  • Funding: FWO
The Digital Turn in Epistemology

In this multi-disciplinary project, philosophers will join mathematics education researchers to study how the nature of mathematical knowledge changes through the use of digital tools, and what consequences this has for the epistemology of mathematics. The researchers will approach the junction of mathematics, math education and digital tools from a variety of perspectives. The project is part of Utrecht University’s efforts to encourage education innovation and to improve the quality of education.

  • Project members: Prof. F.A. Muller, Dr Arthur Bakker, Prof. Jan Broersen
  • Partners: Faculty of Philosophy at Erasmus University Rotterdam, Noordhoff Publishers
  • Duration: 2016 - 2021
  • Funding: NWO Creative Industry
Responsible Intelligent Systems

As intelligent systems are increasingly integrated into our daily life, the division, assignment and checking of responsibilities between human and artificial agents become increasingly important. From robots in medicine, the military, to automated protection systems; we delegate more and more responsibility to intelligent devices. By delegating responsibilities to intelligent devices, we run the risk of losing track of our indirect legal and moral liabilities. The REINS project aims to address this problem by providing formal and computational frameworks that form the basis for computational systems that enable us to mitigate these risks.